Books

img_JeffreyToday’s guest post comes from Jeffrey Hollender, the founder, executive chairperson and chief inspired protagonist of Seventh Generation, which makes safe and environmentally-responsible products for the home. Jeff is energetic and multi-talented–he is an entrepreneur, the author of several books, including a brand-new one, The Responsibility Revolution, which he wrote with longtime journalist Bill Breen, a lively blogger at the Inspired Protagonist and an activist who sits on the board of Greenpeace USA. (He’s also a good guy and always has been, at least according to my wife; they went to high school together.) I’m looking forward to reading Jeff’s new book and will review it soon. In the meantime, here’s an edited and expanded version of a recent blogpost that he wrote about the challenges that face consumers who face an onslaught of green and sometimes misleading marketing.

As companies step up their spending on green marketing, the confusion about what’s truly green is getting worse.

For consumers, it’s a challenge to cut through the clutter and decide whether to buy green products or support green companies.

Here’s a guideline that is easy to follow:

We should absolutely not support green products from companies that use them to distract us from their larger negative environmental and social impacts. We need systemically green companies to address the challenges we face, not business-as-usual companies that hold up one green hand while hiding another toxic, CO2-emitting, waste-producing one behind their backs.

Two examples: [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 1 comment }

Many books shaped my thinking about business, economics and the environment during 2009. Last year was the year that I discovered Nassim Nicholas Taleb and The Black Swan, to my great delight, as well as the year that I began to explore behavioral economics by reading Daniel Ariely’s Predictably Irrational and Nudge by Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler. I enjoyed my friend Russell Roberts’ libertarian romance (yep) The Invisible Heart, and I learned a lot from The Myth of the Rational Market, a timely and readable history of the economics of markets by my ex-Fortune colleague Justin Fox.  The Good Soldiers by David Finkel is a searing up-close look at the surge in Iraq that should be read by any American citizen who wants to better understand the human costs of the wars being waged by our government.

SBjpg-filteredBut the book that I most want to recommend to readers of this blog is Whole Earth Discipline: An Ecopragmatist Manifesto by Stewart Brand. It’s brilliant, controversial, unconventional and lively. Nothing I read in 2009 changed my thinking more.

I’m not alone in my admiration for Stewart’s book. Paul Hawken calls it “likely one of the most original and important books of the century.…” Edward O. Wilson says it is “ominous and exhilirating.” Larry Brilliant says it is “an absolutely seminal work, extraordinarily well written, a tour de force of so many interconnected worlds and lives and studies.” Nice blurbs, no?

The praise is all the more remarkable because Whole Earth Discipline argues that we need nuclear power to combat global warming, that we need biotechnology to feed the world and that we need to take  geo-engineering seriously — ideas that are anathema to much, though not all, of the environmental movement that Stewart helped create roughly 40 years ago.

For those of you (younger readers) who aren’t familiar with his work, Stewart, who is a vigorous 72-year-old, is best known as the editor of Whole Earth Catalog, an influential compendium of all things countercultural, published in the late 1960s and 1970s, with a photo of the earth seen from space on its cover. After an LSD-induced experience that got him thinking about the curve of the earth, Stewart campaigned to have NASA release the picture. Later, he wrote:

It is no accident of history that the first Earth Day, in April 1970, came so soon after color photographs of the whole earth from space were made by homesick astronauts on the Apollo 8 mission to the moon in December 1968. Those riveting Earth photos reframed everything. For the first time humanity saw itself from outside… Humanity’s habitat looked tiny, fragile and rare. Suddenly humans had a planet to tend to.

Since then, Stewart has been a writer, a speaker, an organizer, a pioneer of online communities as a founder of the WELL (the “Whole Eart ‘Lectronic Link,” where I first discovered the power of the Internet), a consultant to companies and the owner of a tugboat in San Francisco where he lives with his wife, Ryan Phelan. He writes: [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 3 comments }

Have you heard that we’re getting new neighbors? Demographers expect that the number of people living on earth—now about 6.8 billion—will grow to between 8 and 11 billion by 2050.

Whether population tops out at the high or the low end of those projections will have a huge impact on climate change. So population control is again claiming a place on the environmental agenda.

Nairobi slums

Nairobi slums

Oops! Did I say “population control”? I should have said “addressing population growth” or “assuring reproductive rights for women” or even “securing population justice” — because some people get very nervous when environmentalists start talking about population, and for good reason.

Yet the conversation is worth having, which is why I went to a discussion today at the Center for American Progress in Washington featuring Laurie Mazur, the editor of a new book called A Pivotal Moment: Population, Justice & The Environmental Challenge (Island Press, $30).

Mazur argues that we are at a pivotal moment, not just environmentally, because of the lethal overheating of the planet, but demographically, because, as she writes,

the ultimate size of the human population will be decided in the next decade or so.

That’s because right now the largest generation of young people in human history is coming of age. Nearly half the world’s population—some 3 billion people—is under the age of twenty-five. Those young people will, quite literally, shape the future. [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 8 comments }

vegetarian-foodAt the Net Impact conference last week, a waiter stopped by before lunch to ask if anyone at our table wanted a vegetarian meal instead of chicken. Just one or two people did.

This, as it happens, is typical. When a meat-based entrée is being served, and people are offered a vegetarian alternative, about 5 to 10% will request it.

But what if the choices were reversed? Organizers of the 2009 Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference, which began today in Washington, tried an experiment: They made a vegetarian lunch the default option, and gave meat eaters the choice of opting out.

Some 80% went for the veggies, not because there were lots of vegetarians in the crowd of about 700 people but because the choice was framed differently. We know that because, at a prior BECC conference, when meat was the default option, attendees chose the meat by an 83% to 17% margin.

More than lunch is at stake here. “Omnivores contribute seven times the greenhouse gas emissions, when compared to vegans,” says Karen Ehrhardt-Martinez, the conference chair, who works for the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.

Might there be broad-based ways to promote a vegetarian diet, while giving people the freedom to choose what they want? How can smart-grid technology be designed to encourage people to conserve energy? Which “green” marketing messages work, and which don’t? Can the insights of behavioral economics help fight climate change?

Those are the questions that engaged the policy makers, academics, and business executives at this BECC event, which differs from most conversations about climate change. [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 15 comments }

FGB Book Portrait Wood (IMG_8241_1)Just last week, Frances Beinecke, the president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, gave a speech to a Chicago business audience and the first question went something like this: I read the Wall Street Journal, I still don’t believe in climate science and I want to hear the full  story.

Beinecke’s new book, Clean Energy Common Sense: An American Call to Action on Global Climate Change (Rowan & Littlefield, $9.95), is aimed at those who are skeptical–or at least curious–about the climate change debate. It’s a slim (106 pages), straightforward, easy-to-read argument that  that attempts to connect the climate issue to everyday concerns like jobs, the economy and national security.

“When you go out to Gary, Indiana, Cleveland or Chicago, people are still uncertain,” Beinecke said, as she unveiled the book at the National Press Club in Washington.” They’re not clear on what the science is, what the solutions are, what the threats are, what the impacts are.”

And so Beinecke, as you’d expect, makes the case that the problem is dire, the solutions affordable and the benefits tangible–new jobs, less reliance on imported oil and a livable planet.

To her credit, though, she’s willing to go beyond the what’s-in-it-for-you argument and describe the climate crisis as what it is–the overarching moral issue of the moment, and one requiring immediate action:

Global climate change is the single greatest environmental challenge of our time. And yet, it is far more than that. It is a humanitarian challenge. It is an economic challenge. It is a national security challenge. It is the great moral challenge of our time.

If only more political leaders would frame the issue that way, instead of appealing only to the narrow self interest of voters. [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 0 comments }

Today was a special day for me. I completed the 34th running of the Marine Corps Marathon, a 26.2-mile run through the streets of Washington and Arlington, Va., with a finish at a famed statue of Iwo Jima known as the Marine Corps War Memorial. I’ve run 17 marathons, but the Marine Corps has a unique place in my heart because it was the first marathon that I ran, back in 1994.

Two things struck me about today’s race. The first is that the MCM made a significant effort to “go green.” Marathons are, inevitably, messy affairs and they generate enormous amounts of trash. An estimated 850,000 (!) paper cups are needed to stock the water and Powerade stops to keep 21,000 runners well hydrated. Add to that 26,000 Clif shots, 25,000 bag of sports beans, 10,000 sliced oranges—well, you get the idea. Lots of garbage, much of it unavoidable.

photoThe MCM says its goal this year was to cut the trash in half, and produce less than a pound of landfill waste per runner. Sponsor Aquafina set up recycling kiosks near the start and finish line. Race waste, including cups, is composted. And, in an experiment, the race bibs given out at a fun run for kids were made of recycled post-consumer and wildflower seeds. The young runners can plant their bibs and enjoy growing Black-Eyed Susans along with the satisfaction of being green. MCM also collected used running shoes at its expos, for donation to people who need them.

While much of this is symbolic, symbols matter. Promoting environmentally-friendly sports events is a nonprofit called the Council for Responsible Sport (ReSport), along with a group called Athletes for a Fit Planet (“greening the world one race at a time”). Cool.

On a more sober note, running in the Marine Corps marathon is always a reminder of the sacrifices so many people make for our country. [click to continue…]

Print Friendly

{ 10 comments }

Can a company care?

June 4, 2009

Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Fly the Friendly Skies. You’re in good hands with Allstate. Talk to Chuck.  You have a friend at Chase Manhattan. (I know, I’m dating myself with that last one.)

For a long time, companies have sought to be our friends, neighbors and companions. Many tell their workers that they are all part of the family. Or at a minimum playing on the same team.

Is this all marketing b.s. or can companies care? I believe they can. My 2004 book, Faith and Fortune: How Compassionate Capitalism is Transforming American Business argued that smart companies (Herman Miller, Timberland, UPS, Southwest Airlines and Starbucks, among others) are driven by an ethic of service—to their employees, their customers and their shareholders, frequently in that order. This ethic of service generates loyalty and creates a powerful competitive advantage: Happier and more fulfilled employees mean satisfied customers, and satisfied customers generate long-term value for shareholders. Caring is good business.

The thing is, companies that say they care need to behave that way.  In tough times, that’s tough: Starbucks eliminated more than 6,000 jobs when its business went south last year. This doesn’t make Starbucks hypocritical when it cames to be a good employer, but, at the least, it puts a burden on the company to treat people well on the way out.

A provocative and lively book I’ve been reading, called Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions, explores these question in a chapter called The Cost of Social Norms: Why We Are Happy to Do Things, but Not When We Are Paid to Them. The author, Dan Ariely, argues that we live simultaneously in two worlds, one characterized by social exchanges and the other characterized by market exchanges. The first is the world of family, friends, neighbors and community, the second the world of business, wages, prices and rents. “When we keep social norms and market norms on their separate paths,” Ariely writes, “life hums along pretty well.” But when they collide, look out. Think about what happens when a guy tries to persuade his wife or girlfriend to have sex with him because he just bought her an expensive dinner—Ariely’s example, not mine.

Businesses gain when they bring social norms to the marketplace, Ariely says:

If customers and a company are family, then the company gets several benefits. Loyalty is paramount. Minor infractions—screwing up your bill or even imposing a modest hike in your insurance rates—are accommodated. Relationships of course have ups and downs but of course they are a pretty good thing.

I’m willing to bet that Southwest customers are less grumpy about flight delays than those on United or Delta because they have a sense that the company wants to treat them right. When I buy something at Nordstrom or L.L. Bean and something’s amiss, I’m okay with that because I know they’ll happily take the merchandise back.

Trouble arises when companies don’t deliver what they promise. We know that we can’t literally “talk to Chuck” but Charles Schwab had better make sure that the people who answer its phones are friendly, responsive and knowledgeable. State Farm has to act like a neighbor when a customer submits a claim. As Ariely writes:

If you’re a company, my advice is to remember that you can’t have it both ways. You can’t treat your customers like family one moment, and then treat them impersonally—or even worse as a nuisance or a competitor—a moment later when this becomes more convenient or profitable.

Just to be clear, Ariely isn’t saying that companies should only operate by market norms. He believes in the power of social norms, and his experiments in behavioral economics back him up.

“Cash will only take you so far,” he writes. “Social norms are the forces that can make a difference in the long run.” Money, he goes on to say, is “very often the most expensive way to motivate people. Social norms are not only cheaper, but more effective.”

Put simply, we’ll all work hard for a cause – or a company – that we believe in. Look at the success of open-source software or Wikipedia, where creators don’t get paid at all.

Much of this dovetails (pun intended) with the work of one of my writing/consulting clients, Dov Seidman, the founder and CEO of a company called LRN and author of a book, HOW: Why HOW We Do Anything Means Everything in Business (and in Life). Dov talks about how companies need to inspire, rather than coerce or motivate, their workforce. He also says that the best businesses need to “out-behave” their competition. I agree, but Ariely reminds us that this is a risky way of doing business.

Those who say that they care create high expectations that they had better meet.

images16

Print Friendly

{ 4 comments }

Anyone who knows Jeffrey Hollender, the co-founder and longtime CEO of Seventh Generation, knows that his ambitions go way beyond selling laundry detergent and paper towels.

Hollender wants to help business do business better, so that companies can help create a better world for future generations. That’s a big dream, but it explains why he has become an author of several books, the host of a new cable TV show, an outspoken blogger and a supporter of an innovative, worker-owned green cleaning business. Busy guy.

That’s also why Jeffrey said today that he is stepping down as CEO of Seventh Generation, the Burlington, Vermont, based company that makes healthy and safe household and personal-care products. He has led the company for the past 20 years.

Over the phone last week, Jeffrey, who is 54, told me that his decision to step down would be both a good thing for him and great news for Seventh Generation. “I’ve got so many things I want to do,” he said. “Two books coming out in the next nine months. The television show. And about at the same time as I was working on all that, I came to the conclusion that the growth and complexity of the business was going to require an executive with more experience.”

Today, Seventh Generation announced that its new CEO is Chuck Maniscalco. He’s got an impressive business resume—he spent 21 years at Quaker Oats before PepsiCo bought that bran in 2001, and until 2008 he was president and CEO of PepsiCo’s $10 billion Quaker, Tropicana, and Gatorade businesses. He launched Propel Fitness Water and grew its revenues to over $500 million—a nice thing for PepsiCo, although bottled water (oops, I mean “fitness water”) is not exactly a favorite product of the sustainability crowd. Most recently, Maniscalco started a company called Manifest Leadership. Here is his first blog as the CEO of Seventh Generation and here is personal website. (Very cool that he is a guitar player, singer and composer—check out his tunes! And he is a runner, too.)

Seventh Generation has about $150 million in sales this year and so is well past the point where it has to worry about survival. The goal for  Maniscalco is to drive sales to about $1 billion, while retaining the company’s fierce commitment to environmental and social responsibility. That won’t be easy, particularly because the market for green household and personal care products is becoming more crowded all the time. (See my GreenBiz column on The Evolution of Laundry Detergent.)

As for Jeffrey, he’s got a couple of books to promote,  both aimed at sharing the ideals that shaped Seventh Generation with a broader audience. In Our Every Deliberation, Seventh Generation’s Journey toward Corporate Consciousness will be published by the company next month and Good Company will be published early next year by Jossey-Bass. (Jeffrey’s 2006 book, What Matters Most: How a Small Group of Pioneers Is Teaching Social Responsibility to Big Business, and Why Big Business Is Listening, which he wrote with Stephen Fenichell, is very good. I probably should disclose here that Jeffrey, Stephen and my wife Karen Schneider were 1970s high school classmates in The Bronx.) Jeffrey’s also hoping to keep on producing episodes of his TV show, called Big Green Lies, the pilot of which was shown on Earth Day on the Fine Living Network.

Perhaps most interestingly, Jeffrey has been working with a nonprofit called WAGES (Women’s Action to Gain Economic Security) to launch a series of cooperatives called Home Green Home in San Francisco. These are cleaning services owned by women, most of them Hispanic immigrants who before then had been cleaning homes but working for others.

“These women are making two to three times more money than they were making before,” Jeffrey told me. “They all have health insurance. And they are owners of their own business. It’s proved to be a very successful model.”

“The challenge we are trying to figure out is how to scale it up more quickly,” he said. In that regard, the challenge is figuring out how to deliver training in new markets; each woman gets extensive training both in business skills like accounting and marketing andaround more personal issues such as “what happens when the woman in the family ends up making more money than the man.” The Home Green Home coops use Seventh Generation products, of course.

You can read Jeffrey’s account of his decision here on the Seventh Generation blog. Among other things, he writes:

It may surprise you to learn that my decision was a relatively easy one to make. For some time, I’ve been deeply involved both personally and professionally in teaching myself and everyone here at Seventh Generation how to break free of old patterns….My passion to transform the way business does business by grounding companies with a new sense of purpose and possibility, teaching the next generation of business leaders about a new way to lead, and helping our customers to become more conscious about their consumption will no doubt keep me very busy.

You can be sure that whatever Jeffrey (below) does next will be worth watching.
3445292108_330edc5340

Print Friendly

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Creative destruction & me

April 30, 2009

During one of my morning runs this week, I was listening to the Slate Culture Gabfest on my iPod shuffle, where Stephen Metcalf, Dana Stevens and Julia Turner were having a lively conversation about Twitter, when it struck me: This is a digital media moment to remember.

I’m a big fan of podcasts. I enjoy Slate’s Political Gabfest as well as the Culture Gabfest, This American Life, the occasional Fresh Air and Frank Deford’s sports commentaries. One of my favorites is Sea Change Radio, which covers environmental and social issues from a liberal perspective. Bill Baue and Francesca Rheannon do a great job, and I’d say that even if I were not interviewed on the latest edition of the show, about green jobs. I’ve also learned a lot from EconTalk, a weekly in-depth podcast about economics, usually reflecting free market ideas, hosted by Russ Roberts. (Russ is also the author of The Invisible Heart: An Economic Romance, a surprisingly entertaining novel about a libertarian teacher of high school economics who is smitten with a liberal English instructor.)

Why am I telling you all this? Because, although I’m as unhappy as anyone about the terrible things happening to the newspaper and magazine businesses these days, what’s often overlooked in all the laments for the decline of print journalism is the other side of the story: the explosion of ideas and (less so) information in the digital media. Just this week, Portfolio magazine closed and the Baltimore Sun laid off nearly a third of its staff. But barely a day goes by when I don’t discover a new and worthwhile blog. Twitter and Facebook point me to news stories and commentary that I would otherwise have missed. A growing number of college courses by great teachers are being put online. And of course thanks to Google, we all have access to more information at our fingertips than we have ever had before. I can barely remember life before Google.

For me, this is personal, of course. I spent more than 30 years as a writer of print journalism—newspaper and magazine stories and books. Now more of my time is spent producing digital media–not just stories and columns but podcasts and Tweets as well.  Much as I love magazine journalism (and I’m about to get to work on a story for FORTUNE), I must say that I have come to enjoy the immediacy of blogging, the feedback that I get from writing for Greenbiz.com and The Energy Collective, the chance to contribute to a fine publication like Slate. Like most people, I’m also spending more time consuming digital content and less time with print.

The economist Josephy Shumpeter called this “creative destruction,” and it is both creative and destructive–as well as fascinating and a little scary to watch as it unfolds. For the second time in a week or so, I’m going end with by quoting Joni Mitchell: “Don’t it always seem to go that you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone?”

images14

Print Friendly

{ 1 comment }

Jacqueline Novogratz was out for her customary morning jog on the streets of Kigali, Rwanda, when she noticed a young boy wearing a blue wool sweater decorated with zebras and mountains. This was 1987, and Novogratz was an idealistic 25-year-old aid worker, helping a  local women to start a microfinance bank. The sweater looked very much like one she had given away to Goodwill back when she was in high school in Virginia, and she startled the boy by asking to see the label. Sure enough, there was her name.

The anecdote is the perfect opening for Novogratz’s new book, The Blue Sweater: Bridging the Gap Between Rich and Poor in An Interconnected World, which is part memoir, part meditation on the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and part manifesto about how to attack (and how not to attack) the problem of global poverty.  “The story of the blue sweater has always reminded me of how we are all connected,” Novogratz writes.

the-blue-sweater-cover

Novogratz is the founder and CEO of the Acumen Fund, a really impressive global nonprofit that provides “patient capital” to for-profit businesses around the world that help people climb out of poverty. She’s spoken at several FORTUNE conferences, I interviewed her for Net Impact and we had lunch a few years ago in Washington. (See this from HuffPost.) Novogratz is passionate and idealistic and yet hard-headed in her approach to global poverty. This book explains why.

Trained as a banker—she worked for Chase Manhattan in Latin America after college—she spent the late 1980s in Africa, particularly in Rwanda where she helped women start both Duterimbere, the microfinance institution, and a local bakery. These are among the most fascinating stories in the book—she arrives as a well-meaning do-gooder, bursting with ideas, and runs up against indifferent bureaucrats, petty corruption and women so conditioned to be passive that it’s a struggle to get them to believe in themselves. Just before heading to business school at Stanford, she climbs a volcano in Zaire and is beaten up by altitude sickness and hypothermia. She writes:

I came to Africa similarly unprepared, with no road map, no tools, insufficient gear and no protective layering…Like the volcano, Africa can stun you in an instant. It can throw floods and drought and disease at you, sometimes all at the same time. In the next moment, it will tease you with its magnificent beauty, so even if you don’t forget, you can find a way to forgive. Ultimately, it keeps you coming back for more.

Fast forward to 2001.  After Stanford and a stint at the Rockefeller Foundation, Novogratz raised about $8 million from Rockefeller, the Cisco Foundation and wealthy individuals to start Acumen (which her brother suggested she call ‘Ain’t Your Grandma’s Philanthropy’). Acumen tackles old problems — malaria, children’s health, housing – in new ways.

For example, Acumen invested $600,000 in a for-profit company called Water Health International that treats water as a business, not as a human right. WHI was started by Tralance Addy, a Ghanian entrepreneur who after working at Johnson & Johnson, developed a system to deliver safe drinking water to rural poor people, mostly in India, at prices they can afford. In the last four years, WHI has grown to serve more than 350,000 customers in 200 villages and it has raised $12 million in additional capital.

Early on, Acumen also invested in A to Z Textile Mills, which manufacturers bednets with long-lasting insecticides that are sold across Africa to prevent malaria. If I heard her right during a podcast with Dan Gross on Slate, Novogratz said that the company now employs 7,000 people, mostly women, and produces more than 10 million bednets a year. Again, Acumen took a charity model and turned it into a sustainable, purpose-driven business.

More recently, Acumen has expanded into the energy business, trying to bring electricity to some of the 1.6 billion people in the world whose lives do not include an on-off switch. Acumen Fund is investing in a startup company called D.light Design that makes low-cost LED lights. The company’s first product, called the Nova, is an all-purpose portable LED lamp that is both AC-rechargeable and solar-rechargeable, and can provide up to 40 hours of light on a full charge. Fascinating idea.

Near the end of The Blue Sweater, Novogratz writes:

After more than 20 years of working in Africa, India and Pakistan, I’ve learned that solutions to poverty must be driven by discipline, accountability and market strength, not easy sentimentality. I’ve learned that many of the answers to poverty lie in the space between the market and charity and that what is needed most of all is moral leadership willing to build solutions from the perspectives of poor people themselves rather than imposing grand theories and plans upon them.

You can read more about Acumen’s work at its excellent website.
images11

Print Friendly

{ 2 comments }

Coupons
Coupon Forum
Trompi.ro