marc marc
marc
marc marc
blog about books journalism speaking contact

Archive for the ‘Global Poverty’ Category

Amazing gadgets for the poor

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Imagine that you live in a poor country, without money for a pair of glasses or access to an optometrist, and you’re not seeing as well as you once did.

This product, a pair of self-adjusting eyeglasses, could change your life.

big_66

Or imagine that you are one of the 1.1 billion people on earth without access to clean, safe drinking water. Your child is in danger of contracting water-borne diseases, which kills 1.8 million a year. What would you give for this portable, water-filtration device, called LifeStraw?

big_54

Maybe you are one of the 1.6 billion people without regular access to electricity. Your children study at night using a kerosene lantern, but the fuel is expensive and dirty. A solar-powered lantern would be a dramatic improvement.

big_107

These breakthrough products, all of them invented in the last 5 o 10 years, are examples of what can be done when technology is designed for the poor. You’ve probably heard about One Laptop Per Child (OLPC), the low-cost connected computer developed by Nicholas Negroponte and the MIT Media Lab, but it’s just one of dozens of high-tech, high-impact products aimed at helping to spur global economic development. The trouble is, even though many of the products are low-cost–the LifeStraw, for example, sells for about $6.50–they aren’t available to many who need them.

That’s where a nonprofit called Kopernik comes in. Kopernik connects innovative technologies, poor communities and people who want to help. (more…)

COP15: Marriott waves a REDD flag

Monday, December 14th, 2009

8781676_290a2bf045In Amazonas, Brazil’s largest state, children and adults are going to school for the first time, families are paid $25 a month and startup businesses and community organizations are getting funded. The money comes from the state government and corporations including Marriott International, two Brazilian banks, Bradesco and Banco de Planeta,  and Coca-Cola’s bottler in Brazil.

In return, the Amazon dwellers simply agree not to cut down trees.

This deal—in which companies and governments pay people who pledge not to destroy rainforests—is the essence of a concept known as REDD, which stands for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation.

REDD is an important element of the UN climate negotiations unfolding this week here in Copenhagen, as well as a vital – and potentially controversial – plank of the climate bills pending in Congress.

“We will only win this deforestation battle if we can find ways to make the forest worth more standing that they are when cut down,” says Virgilio Viana, direct of Fundacao Amazonas Sustentavel, which oversees the project in the Juma Preserve of the Amazon. Juma is a 1.8 million acre region—about the size of Delaware—which is 98% forested. (more…)

COP15: A demand for climate justice

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

sea_of_light.tck_Many thousands of people protested in Copenhagen yesterday and last night, demanding, among other things, climate justice. According to tcktcktck.org, which has a gallery of images, many thousands more held vigils areound the world. But what does climate justice mean?

To give you a flavor, here is a statement from an activist named Hemantha Withnage of Sri Lanka, who was speaking to a UN-backed group called the Subsidiary Body for Implementation, which oversees the Kyoto Protocol. I’m not going to comment other than to say that there is a yawning gap between the views expressed here and those heard in the halls of the United States Congress. And yet a global agreement to regulate climate will require an accord that, in some way, takes these views into account. Remember, China and India are seeking climate justice, too.

We are movements gathered under the Climate Justice Now! Network – many from the South, from developing countries.  Thousands of our members are here in Copenhagen, joining thousands of other citizens in a historic march.

We are calling for Reparations for Climate Debt, the debt that is owed by northern countries, multinational corporations, and international financial institutions to the peoples and countries of the South. This debt is owed by the North for using up more than their fair share of the earth’s capacity to absorb greenhouse gases, and in the process depriving the peoples of the (more…)

Let’s talk (carefully) about climate and population

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Have you heard that we’re getting new neighbors? Demographers expect that the number of people living on earth—now about 6.8 billion—will grow to between 8 and 11 billion by 2050.

Whether population tops out at the high or the low end of those projections will have a huge impact on climate change. So population control is again claiming a place on the environmental agenda.

Nairobi slums

Nairobi slums

Oops! Did I say “population control”? I should have said “addressing population growth” or “assuring reproductive rights for women” or even “securing population justice” — because some people get very nervous when environmentalists start talking about population, and for good reason.

Yet the conversation is worth having, which is why I went to a discussion today at the Center for American Progress in Washington featuring Laurie Mazur, the editor of a new book called A Pivotal Moment: Population, Justice & The Environmental Challenge (Island Press, $30).

Mazur argues that we are at a pivotal moment, not just environmentally, because of the lethal overheating of the planet, but demographically, because, as she writes,

the ultimate size of the human population will be decided in the next decade or so.

That’s because right now the largest generation of young people in human history is coming of age. Nearly half the world’s population—some 3 billion people—is under the age of twenty-five. Those young people will, quite literally, shape the future. (more…)

Cartier goes for the gold

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

All too often, behind the glitter of gold are ugly environmental and social costs: Unregulated mines creating toxic wastes, child laborers working under grim conditions, rivers and bays polluted with waste. Sales of diamonds, meanwhile, have been used to finance wars in Africa. Under pressure, the jewelry industry has responded with programs to monitor the supply chains of precious metals and gems from the mine to the retailer. (Last year, in a FORTUNE story headlined Green Gold, I wrote about Wal-Mart and Tiffany’s pioneering efforts to find “sustainable gold.”) But cleaning up the mining industry is an enormous challenge, and so there are bound to be setbacks as well as gains.

Eucantera

Artisanal miner at Eurocantera

One big setback this week: A government and industry initiative set up to stop the flow of so-called conflict diamonds, known as the Kimberly Process, failed to suspend Zimbabwe even after its own investigators had found that the Zimbabwean military had organized smuggling of diamonds and assaulted other miners. According to The New York Times:

Human rights campaigners and nongovernmental organizations immediately denounced the decision, saying that the Kimberley Process had shown it was incapable of stopping gross abuses and the flouting of international standards.

Kimberly Process officials said they want to give the government a chance to come into compliance. We’ll see, but know that, for now, diamonds certified as conflict-free may be helping to finance human rights abuses in Zimbabwe.

On a more encouraging note, luxury jeweler and watch-maker Cartier is the latest retailer to look for more responsible ways to source its gold. The French-based firm recently signed an agreement to buy gold from an innovative Italian gold-mining venture based in Honduras. Globalization is a fact of life in the gold biz.

The Honduran mining venture, called Eurocantera, combines a modern alluvial gold mine (meaning that the gold is found in water, close to the surface, requiring no blasting into rock) with small-scale miners who use traditional methods of panning gold. This venture is noteworthy because it supports artisanal miners in a poor country, not only by providing them with decent wages, but by offering education in finance and technology, a free health clinic and road building that is needed to move gold to market but will provide other benefits as well to isolated villages. Put simply, it’s a well-rounded approach. (more…)

Why enviros can’t sleep at night

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

Guess what keeps environmentalists up at night? And worries me, too?

If President Obama and the Democrats are struggling to find 60 votes in the Senate to pass domestic climate-change legislation, how on earth will they get the 67 votes needed to ratify a global treaty to deal with the problem, even assuming –and this is a big assumption — that the UNFCCC (that’s the United Nations Framework  Convention on Climate Change, for the uninitiated) can get a global deal done this winter in Copenhagen?

For the U.S. to approve a climate bill and a treaty, Congress will have to be persuaded of three things:

  1. A cap-and-trade scheme that few people understand will help, not harm, the economy.
  2. It makes sense to ship American consumer or taxpayer dollars to China and India, to help those countries develop low-carbon economies.
  3. We can trust the UN to make the whole shebang work.

See the problem?

The climate-change issue takes center stage next week when President Obama addresses the UN in New York, and government officials from around the world converge on the city for a series of events organized as part of Climate Week. (I’ll be moderating a panel on carbon finance for Greenbiz.com and Ecosecurities on Tuesday afternoon; email me if you’d like an invitation.)

Mark Kenber

Mark Kenber

To get some insight into the global negotiations, I met with Mark Kenber, policy director of The Climate Group, a global NGO that is working with government and business leaders all  to get a deal done. The Climate Group’s point man is Tony Blair, so these folks get in to see anyone they want. They have published an excellent series of reports on the politics, economics and technology of climate, all of them in plain English and with few wasted words. In fact, the studies are designed with CEOs and heads of government in mind – people with no time to waste – so they provide an excellent overview of the issues. I’d especially recommend a 2008 report called Breaking the Climate Deadlock: A Global Deal for Our Low Carbon Future [PDF] (more…)

The Nature Conservancy’s Mark Tercek sees REDD

Sunday, September 13th, 2009

Mark Tercek left Goldman Sachs after a long and successful career midway through 2008, just before the global financial meltdown. Good timing, except that Tercek moved on to become the president and CEO of The Nature Conservancy, the world’s biggest environmental organization, as  the global climate crisis is intensifying.

He feels the pressure. There’s more work than ever to do, and money is tight at the conservancy. “This is really hard,” Tercek told me recently. “What a responsibility we have to get this right.”

Mark Tercek

Mark Tercek

By “this,” Tercek means climate change policy in general and REDD in particular. REDD stands for Reducing Emissions from Degradation and Deforestation, and it’s an absolutely crucial strategy for dealing with climate change that requires slowing the growth of agriculture, forestry and cattle ranching to protect forests in places like Indonesia and Brazil. Because tropical forests are being degraded or cut down at an alarming rate, Indonesia and Brazil are ranked No. 3 and No. 4, respectively, by some studies when it comes to carbon emissions, behind the U.S. and China  but ahead of Japan or Germany. Deforestation could account for as much as 25 percent of emissions, these studies show.

The fundamental idea behind REDD is to get businesses and governments in richer countries to help finance sustainable livelihoods for people in poor countries so they don’t have to cut down trees to earn a living. (more…)

Manna from Houston

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

Of all the problems threatening the world today, two loom large. One is the climate crisis. The other is the fact that billions of people lack access to clean water and sanitation. A Houston, Texas-based startup with global ambitions wants to attack both, beginning in the tiny, landlocked African nation of Rwanda.

The startup, called Manna Energy Ltd., has an ingenious idea, some high-flying (literally) founders and the enthusiastic support of, among others, The Coca-Cola Foundation and Ashoka, a nonprofit group that connects social entrepreneurs. The company’s idea, in essence, is this: Collect rainwater, filter it using solar energy and finance the operation with credits generated by reducing global warming pollution.

Manna installs its water-treatment systems at secondary schools and, if all goes according to plan, they will more than pay for themselves.. “It’s the only for-profit model I’ve seen to bring safe drinking water to schools, and it would be pretty remarkable if they can pull it off,” says Paul Faeth, executive director of the Global Water Challenge, a Washington-based business coalition that supports Manna.

The founder of Manna Energy is Ron Garan, a NASA astronaut and aerospace engineer  who has logged more than 13 days in space, including three spacewalks,  and is preparing for a six-month mission next year. Spearheading the work in Rwanda is Evan Thomas, Manna’s executive vice president, who got the project started as a volunteer back in the early 2000s and since then has worked on sustainable development  in Rwanda, Nepal, Mexico and Afghanistan.

Thomas, who is just 26 and also works at NASA, has a PhD in aerospace engineering and bio-astronautics from the University of Colorado. His academic research on life-support systems in space informs his work in Rwanda, he explained when we talked last week by phone.

“We’re trying to keep people alive in Rwanda, just as we try to keep people alive and healthy in space, with air and water and energy,” Thomas says.

Founder Garan, evp Thomas and engineer Jean-Pierre Habanakabize in Rwanda

Founder Garan, evp Thomas and engineer Jean-Pierre Habanakabize in Rwanda

(more…)

The World Bank’s coal problem

Friday, July 24th, 2009

So much is going on in the world of business and sustainability that no one can keep up with it all. I’ve decided, as a result, to occasionally feature guest posts  from smart people who follow topics I don’t. Today’s post comes from Mindy Lubber of Ceres, a coalition of institutional investors and environmental groups that works to integrate sustainability into capital markets. Mindy has spoken at FORTUNE’s Brainstorm Green conference, and she’s one of those people who moves easily between the world of advocacy and the realities of corporate America. Her topic today is the folly of financing new coal plants in the developing world.

ceres_logo_color_bigIn Washington, it’s a popular climate conundrum everyone talks about: Even if the U.S. lowers its greenhouse gas emissions, China and India are on track to dwarf the entire Western World’s as they build enormous coal-fired power plants. Politicians regularly say we must get China and India to use less coal, the dirtiest of fossil fuels, to power their emerging economies.

But who do you think is financing all these new coal plants in the developing world?

Try the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and other international public financial institutions supported by the world’s wealthiest nations.
(more…)

Vanguard’s shame

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Harvard, Yale and Stanford did it. So did the pension funds of 27 states, including California and New York. And investment firm TIAA-CREF.

So why won’t Vanguard, the big mutual fund company, agree to use its influence to get big companies to stop supporting the genocide in Darfur?

At Vanguard’s shareholders meeting last week, owners of the company’s mutual funds rejected a proposal that would have required the funds to come up with ways to avoid “holding investments in companies that, in the judgment of the Board, substantially contribute to genocide or crimes against humanity.”
Fidelity Genocide

The votes weren’t even close. For the the 21 Vanguard funds reporting results, affirmative votes ranged between 7 and 17%. On its website, the company said:

An average of 89% of Vanguard shareholders voted against this proposal. The vote demonstrates that Vanguard shareholders have confidence in the funds’ board of trustees and their judgment in fulfilling their fiduciary and investment responsibilities.

Not really. Investors Against Genocide, the shareholder group that submitted the proposal, never had a chance. Proxy votes like the ones at Vanguard are almost always won by management because most investors don’t pay attention to the packages they get at home by mail.
(more…)